FAVOR III China

Tu S, Song L, et al, FAVOR III China study group. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Nov 3;S0140-6736(21)02248-0. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0.

Song L, Tu S, Sun Z, Wang Y, Ding D, Guan C, Xie L, Escaned J, Fearon WF, Kirtane AJ, Serruys PW, Wijns W, Windecker S, Leon MB, Stone GW, Qiao S, FAVOR III China Investigators. Quantitative flow ratio-guided strategy versus angiography-guided strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the FAVOR III China trial. Am Heart J. 2020 May;223:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Feb 24. PMID: 32179258.

FAVOR II China

Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, Guo L, Sun Z, Li Z, Tian F, Fang W, Chen J, Li W, Guan C, Holm NR, Wijns W, Hu S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-3087. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035. Epub 2017 Oct 31. PMID: 29101020.

FAVOR II Europe/Japan

Westra J, Andersen BK, Campo G, Matsuo H, Koltowski L, Eftekhari A, Liu T, Serafino LD, Girolamo DD, Escaned J, Nef H, Naber C, Barbierato M, Tu S, Neghabat O, Madsen M, Tebaldi M, Tanigaki T, Kochman J, Somi S, Esposito G, Mercone G, Mejia-Renteria H, Ronco F, Bøtker HE, Wijns W, Christiansen EH, Holm NR.Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study. J AM HEART ASSOC. 2018;7: e009603. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009603.

Tu S, Ding D, Chang Y, Li C, Wijns W, Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar 4. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29592. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33660921.

FAVOR Pilot

Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, Nef H, Tebaldi M, Murasato Y, Lansky A, Barbato E, van der Heijden LC, Reiber JH, Holm NR, Wijns W; FAVOR Pilot Trial Study Group. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow ReserveFrom Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2024-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013.

WIFI II

Westra J, Tu S, Winther S, Nissen L, Vestergaard MB, Andersen BK, Holck EN, Fox Maule C, Johansen JK, Andreasen LN, Simonsen JK, Zhang Y, Kristensen SD, Maeng M, Kaltoft A, Terkelsen CJ, Krusell LR, Jakobsen L, Reiber JHC, Lassen JF, Bøttcher M, Bøtker HE, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):e007107. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007107.

Lu H, Yao Y, Wang L, Yan J, Tu S, Xie Y, He W. Research Progress of Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Intelligent Diagnosis of the Coronary Atherosclerotic Heart Disease. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2022, Article ID 3016532, 14 pages, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3016532

Takahashi T, Shin D, Kuno T, Lee JM, Latib A, Fearon WF, Maehara A, Kobayashi Y. Diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve derived from coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography; a meta-analysis. J Cardiol. 2022 Mar 10:S0914-5087(22)00047-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.02.015. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35282944.

Ding D, Huang J, Westra J, Cohen DJ, Chen Y, Andersen BK, Holm NR, Tu S, Wijns W. Immediate post-procedural functional assessment of percutaneous coronary intervention: current evidence and future directions. Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 5:ehab186. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab186. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33822922.

Suzuki N, Asano T, Nakazawa G, Aoki J, Tanabe K, Hibi K, Ikari Y, Kozuma K. Clinical expert consensus document on quantitative coronary angiography from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2020 Apr;35(2):105-116. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00653-7. Epub 2020 Mar 3. PMID: 32125622; PMCID: PMC7105443.

Westra J, TuS. Overview of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Optical Flow Ratio in the Assessment of Intermediate Coronary Lesions.  US Cardiology Review 2020;14:e09.

Kogame N, Ono M, Kawashima H, Tomaniak M, Hara H, Leipsic J, Andreini D, Collet C, Patel MR, Tu S, Bourantas CV, Lerman A, Piek JJ, Davies JE, Escaned J, Wijns W, Onuma Y, Serruys PW. The Impact of Coronary Physiology on Contemporary Clinical Decision Making. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 27;13(14):1617-1638. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.040. PMID: 32703589.

De Maria GL, Garcia-Garcia HM, Scarsini R, Hideo-Kajita A, Gonzalo López N, Leone AM, Sarno G, Daemen J, Shlofmitz E, Jeremias A, Tebaldi M, Bezerra HG, Tu S, Lemos PA, Ozaki Y, Dan K, Collet C, Banning AP, Barbato E, Johnson NP, Waksman R. Novel Indices of Coronary Physiology: Do We Need Alternatives to Fractional Flow Reserve? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr;13(4):e008487. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008487. Epub 2020 Apr 16.

Ruitao Z, Jianwei Z, Lijun G. Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Fractional Flow Reserve versus Quantitative Flow Ratio for Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenoses. Journal of Interventional Cardiology. Volume 2020 Article ID 7352150 https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7352150

Cortés C, Carrasco-Moraleja M, Aparisi A, Rodriguez-Gabella T, Campo A, Gutiérrez H, Julca F, Gómez I, San Román JA, Amat-Santos IJ. Quantitative flow ratio—Meta-analysis and systematic review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 20. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28857.

Tu S, Westra J, Adjedj J, Ding D, Liang F, Holm N. R., Reiber H, Wijins W. Fractional Flow Reserve in clinical practice: from wire-based invasive measurement to image-based computation. European Heart Journal. 2020 Sep 7;41(34):3271-3279.doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz918.

PCR-EAPCI TEXTBOOK: Julien Adjedj, Jelmer Westra, Daixin Ding, Junqing Yang, William Wijns, Shengxian Tu. Computational non-invasive physiological assessment of coronary disease. Computational non-invasive physiological assessment of coronary disease. 2019. VOLUME I, PART II.

Zaleska M, Kołtowski Ł, Maksym J, Tomaniak M, Opolski M, Kochman J. Alternative methods for functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions. Cardiol J. 2019 Mar 26. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0027.

Westra J, Tu S, Campo G, Qiao S, Matsuo H, Qu X, Koltowski L, Chang Y, Liu T, Yang J, Andersen BK, Eftekhari A, Christiansen EH, Escaned J, Wijns W, Holm NR. Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in prospectively enrolled patients: An individual patient-data meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28283.

Cesaro A, Gragnano F, Di Girolamo D, Moscarella E, Diana V, Pariggiano I, Alfieri A, Perrotta R, Golino P, Cesaro F, Mercone G, Campo G, Calabrò P. Functional assessment of coronary stenosis: an overview of available techniques. is quantitative flow ratio a step to the future? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Oct 23:1-12. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1540303.

Zuo W, Yang M, Chen Y, Xie A, Chen L, Ma G. Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio versus Quantitative Flow Ratio for Detecting the Functional Significance of Coronary Stenosis. Biomed Res Int. 2019 Apr 18;2019:5828931. doi: 10.1155/2019/5828931. PMID: 31119175; PMCID: PMC6500690.

Collet C, Onuma Y, Sonck J, Asano T, Vandeloo B, Kornowski R, Tu S, Westra J, Holm NR, de Winter RJ, Tijssen JG, Miyazaki Y, Katagiri Y, Tenekecioglu E, Modolo R, Chichareon P, Cosyns B, Schoors D, Roosens B, Lochy S, Argacha JF, van Rosendael A, Bax J, Reiber JHC, Escaned J, De Bruyne B, Wijns W, Serruys PW. Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. European Heart Journal.2018 Sep 14;39(35):3314-3321. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy445. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 21;40(4):356. PMID: 30137305.

Jin Z, Yang X, Jia R, Meng S, Hu H, Deng Y, Cao X, Ruan Y, Han J, Liu J, Qu X, Zhou Y, Wang J, Fu G, Yu B, Wang Y, Guan C, Song L, Tu S, Qiao S, Stone GW; FAVOR III China Study Group. Coronary Intervention Guided by Quantitative Flow Ratio vs Angiography in Patients With or Without Diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Sep 27;80(13):1254-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.06.044. PMID: 36137676.

Zeng QX, Yang T, Xi QY, Zhao ZH. Bilateral pulmonary artery stenosis with pulmonary hypertension due to Takayasu's arteritis, examined using quantitative flow ratio during revascularization. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2021 Dec 4;6(2):ytab495. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab495. PMID: 35295730; PMCID: PMC8922704.

You W, Zhou Y, Wu Z, Meng P, Pan D, Yin D, Yang S, Wu X, Ye F. Post-PCI quantitative flow ratio predicts 3-year outcome after rotational atherectomy in patients with heavily calcified lesions. Clin Cardiol. 2022 May;45(5):558-566. doi: 10.1002/clc.23816. Epub 2022 Mar 21. PMID: 35312085.

Li X, Sun S, Luo D, Yang X, Ye J, Guo X, Xu S, Sun B, Zhang Y, Luo J, Zhou Y, Tu S, Dong H. Microvascular and Prognostic Effect in Lesions With Different Stent Expansion During Primary PCI for STEMI: Insights From Coronary Physiology and Intravascular Ultrasound. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 9;9:816387. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.816387. PMID: 35355977; PMCID: PMC8959302.

Li Z, Zhan J, Han J, Fu G, Jin C. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of immediate angiography derived residual quantitative flow ratio after bioresorbable scaffold and drug eluting stent implantation. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 12;23(2):59. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2302059. PMID: 35229550.

You W, Zhou Y, Wu Z, Meng P, Pan D, Yin D, Yang S, Wu X, Ye F. Post-PCI quantitative flow ratio predicts 3-year outcome after rotational atherectomy in patients with heavily calcified lesions. Clin Cardiol. 2022 Mar 21. doi: 10.1002/clc.23816. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35312085.

Hada M, Hoshino M, Wakasa N, Sugiyama T, Kanaji Y, Yamaguchi M, Misawa T, Nagamine T, Nogami K, Yasui Y, Yonetsu T, Sasano T, Kakuta T. Early effect of percutaneous coronary intervention of non-left anterior descending artery on coronary flow velocity reserve of left anterior descending artery assessed by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. PLoS One. 2021 Aug 13;16(8):e0256161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256161. PMID: 34388217; PMCID: PMC8363006.

Dobrolińska MM, Gąsior PM, Pociask E, Smolka G, Ochala A, Wojakowski W, Roleder T. Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR). Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 23;11(7):1148. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071148. PMID: 34201889; PMCID: PMC8305529.

Finizio M, Melaku GD, Kahsay Y, Beyene S, Kuku KO, Ben-Dor I, Hashim H, Waksman R, Garcia-Garcia HM. Comparison of quantitative flow ratio and invasive physiology indices in a diverse population at a tertiary United States hospital. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Jun 25:S1553-8389(21)00448-6. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.06.115. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34215559.

Zuo W, Sun R, Zhang X, Qu Y, Ji Z, Su Y, Zhang R, Ma G. The Association Between Quantitative Flow Ratio and Intravascular Imaging-defined Vulnerable Plaque Characteristics in Patients With Stable Angina and Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jun 30;8:690262. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.690262. PMID: 34277736; PMCID: PMC8278311.

Wang J, Liu W, Chen H, Liu C, Wang M, Chen H, Zhou H, Liu Z, Zhang S, Yu Z, Duan S, Deng Q, Sun J, Jiang H, Yu L. Novel Insights Into the Interaction Between the Autonomic Nervous System and Inflammation on Coronary Physiology: A Quantitative Flow Ratio Study. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jul 27;8:700943. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.700943. PMID: 34386531; PMCID: PMC8354298.

Li Z, Zhan J, Han J, Fu G, Jin C. Diagnostic Performance of Immediate Angiography Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio In Patients After Second Generation Drug Eluting Stent And Bioresorable Scaffold Implantation. Research Square; 2021. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-657099/v1.

Chen L, Chen Q, Zhong J, Ye Z, Ye M, Yan Y, Chen L, Luo Y. Effect of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goal Achievement on Vascular Physiology Evaluated by Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jun 18;8:679599. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.679599. PMID: 34222375; PMCID: PMC8249848.

Dobrolińska MM, Gąsior PM, Pociask E, Smolka G, Ochala A, Wojakowski W, Roleder T. Performance of Integrated Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) System against Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR). Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 23;11(7):1148. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071148. PMID: 34201889; PMCID: PMC8305529.

Milzi A, Dettori R, Marx N, Reith S, Burgmaier M. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) identifies functional relevance of non-culprit lesions in coronary angiographies of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Jul 12. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01897-w. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34251507.

Meng PN, Liu B, Li LB, Yin DL, Zhang H, Pan DF, You W, Wu ZM, Wu XQ, Zhao L, Li ZB, Wang JP, Wang ZH, Xu T, Huang XY, Gao RN, Ye F. Cut-off values of lesion and vessel quantitative flow ratio in de novo coronary lesion post-drug-coated balloon therapy predicting vessel restenosis at mid-term follow-up. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021 Jun 4. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001577. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34091522.

De Maria GL, Scarsini R, Shanmuganathan M, Kotronias RA, Terentes-Printzios D, Borlotti A, Langrish JP, Lucking AJ, Choudhury RP, Kharbanda R, Ferreira VM; Oxford Acute Myocardial Infarction (OXAMI) Study Investigators, Channon KM, Garcia-Garcia HM, Banning AP. Angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance as a novel, pressure-wire-free tool to assess coronary microcirculation in ST elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Aug;36(8):1395-1406. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01831-7. Epub 2020 May 14. PMID: 32409977; PMCID: PMC7381481.

Geng L, Yuan Y, Du P, Gao L, Wang Y, Li J, Guo W, Huang Y, Zhang Q. Association of quantitative flow ratio-derived microcirculatory indices with anatomical-functional discordance in intermediate coronary lesions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 May 31. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02292-2. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34059977.

Peper J, van Hamersvelt RW, Rensing BJWM, van Kuijk JP, Voskuil M, Berg JMT, Schaap J, Kelder JC, Grobbee DE, Leiner T, Swaans MJ. Diagnostic performance and clinical implications for enhancing a hybrid quantitative flow ratio-FFR revascularization decision-making strategy. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 19;11(1):6425. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85933-9. PMID: 33742077; PMCID: PMC7979768.

Adjedj J, Hyafil F, Aminfar F, Halna du Fretay X, Picard F, Dupouy P, Juliard JM, Muller O, Wijns W, Aubry P; ANOCOR Investigators. Feasibility of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Adult Patients With Anomalous Aortic Origin of the Coronary Artery With 5 Years of Clinical Follow-up. J Invasive Cardiol. 2021 Mar 8:JIC20210308-1. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33723087.

Liu ZY, Yin ZH, Liang CY, He J, Wang CL, Peng X, Zhang Y, Zheng ZF, Pan HW. Zero contrast optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and chronic kidney disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar 25. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29655. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33764682.

Cai X, Tian F, Jing J, Jin Q, Zhou S, Yin W, Chen Y, Wu Q, Fu Z, Chen Y. Prognostic value of quantitative flow ratio measured immediately after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar 20. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29640. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33742738.

Peper J, van Hamersvelt RW, Rensing BJWM, van Kuijk JP, Voskuil M, Berg JMT, Schaap J, Kelder JC, Grobbee DE, Leiner T, Swaans MJ. Diagnostic performance and clinical implications for enhancing a hybrid quantitative flow ratio-FFR revascularization decision-making strategy. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 19;11(1):6425. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85933-9. PMID: 33742077; PMCID: PMC7979768.

Zhong J, Chen Q, Chen L, Ye Z, Chen H, Sun J, Hong J, Ye M, Yan Y, Chen L, Luo Y. Physiological benefits evaluated by quantitative flow ratio in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):523. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01814-5. PMID: 33317462; PMCID: PMC7737262.

Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, Erriquez A, Penzo C, Tumscitz C, Scoccia A, Quadri G, Sacchetta G, Folla A, Vadalà G, Fileti L, Campo G. Comparison of quantitative flow ratio, Pd/Pa and diastolic hyperemia-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve in non-culprit lesion of patients with non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov 19. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29380. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33211381.

Lee SH, Choi KH, Lee JM, Shin D, Hwang D, Kim HK, Doh JH, Nam CW, Shin ES, Jang MJ, Im SY, Park TK, Yang JH, Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Koo BK, Gwon HC. Residual functional SYNTAX score by quantitative flow ratio and improvement of exercise capacity after revascularization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 3. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29118. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32618423.

H Kirigaya, K Okada, K Hibi, E Akiyama, Y Kimura, Y Matsuzawa, N Iwahashi, N Maejima, M Kosuge, K Tamura, K KimuraPost-procedural quantitative flow ratio gradient and target lesion revascularization after drug-coated balloon or plain-old balloon angioplastyEuropean Heart Journal, Volume 41, Issue Supplement_2, November 2020, ehaa946.2446

Choi KH, Lee SH, Lee JM, Hwang D, Zhang J, Kim J, Im SY, Kim HK, Nam CW, Doh JH, Shin ES, Mejía-Rentería H, Park TK, Yang JH, Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Gwon HC, Escaned J, Koo BK. Clinical relevance and prognostic implications of contrast quantitative flow ratio in patients with coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 2020 Sep 8:S0167-5273(20)33736-0. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.09.002. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32910999.

Cerrato E, Belliggiano D, Quadri G, Erriquez A, Anselmino M, Quirós A, Franzè A, Ferrari F, Rolfo C, Mejia-Renteria H, Escaned J, Gonzalo N, Campo G, Varbella F. Anatomical and functional healing after resorbable magnesium scaffold implantation in human coronary vessels: A combined optical coherence tomography and quantitative flow ratio analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov 27. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29397. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33244891.

Sugiyama T, Kanno Y, Hamaya R, Kanaji Y, Hoshino M, Murai T, Lee T, Yonetsu T, Sasano T, Kakuta T. Determinants of visual-functional mismatches as assessed by coronary angiography and quantitative flow ratio. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov 16. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29388. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33197120.

Kleczyński P, Dziewierz A, Rzeszutko Ł, Dudek D, Legutko J. Borderline coronary lesion assessment with quantitative flow ratio and its relation to the instantaneous wave-free ratio. Adv Med Sci. 2020 Nov 12;66(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2020.10.001. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33190031.

Li L, Guan C, Meng S, Bai Y, Zhang Z, Zou K, Ruan Y, Cao X, Jia R, Guo C, Escaned J, Jin Z, Short- and long-term functional results following drug-coated balloons versus drug- eluting stents in small coronary vessels: The RESTORE quantitative flow ratio study. Int J Cardio 2l.020 Nov 21:S0167-5273(20)34158-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.11.035. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33227335.

Westra J, Eftekhari A, Tu S, Campo G, Escaned J, Winther S, Matsuo H, Qu X, Koltowski L, Chang Y, Liu T, Yang J, Andersen BK, Wijns W, Böttcher M, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Resting distal to aortic pressure ratio and fractional flow reserve discordance affects the diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio: Results from an individual patient data meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 1. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28976. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32478462.

Zhang R, Song C, Guan C, Liu Q, Wang C, Xie L, Sun Z, Cai M, Zhang M, Wang H, Liu J, Dou K,Prognostic Value of Quantitative Flow Ratio Based Functional SYNTAX Score in Patients With Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct;13(10):e009155. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009155. Epub 2020 Oct 12. PMID: 33040580.

Choi KH , Lee SH, Lee JM, Hwang D , Zhang J, Kim J , Im SY, Kim HK , Nam CW, Doh JH,Shin ES , Mejía-Rentería H , Park TK , Yang JH , Song YB , Hahn JY, Choi SH , Gwon HC , Escaned J ,Koo BK. Clinical relevance and prognostic implications of contrast quantitative flow ratio in patients with coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol.2020 Sep 8;S0167-5273(20)33736-0. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.09.002.

Van Diemen PA, Driessen RS, Kooistra RA, Stuijfzand WJ, Raijmakers PG, Boellaard R, Schumacher SP, Bom MJ, Everaars H, de Winter RW, van de Ven PM, Reiber JH, Min JK, Leipsic JA, Knuuti J, Underwood RS, van Rossum AC, Danad I, Knaapen P. Comparison Between the Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Perfusion Imaging for Diagnosing Myocardial Ischemia. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 sep;13(9):1976-1985. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.02.012.

Lee SH, Choi KH, Lee JM, Shin D, Hwang D, Kim HK, Doh JH, Nam CW, Shin ES, Jang MJ, Im SY, Park TK, Yang JH, Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Koo BK, Gwon HC. Residual Functional SYNTAX Score by Quantitative Flow Ratio and Improvement of Exercise Capacity After Revascularization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul 3. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29118.

Lauri FM, Macaya F, Mejía-Rentería H, Goto S, Yeoh J, Nakayama M, Quirós A, Liontou C, Pareek N, Fernández-Ortíz A, Macaya C, MacCarthy P, Escaned J; Collaborators. Angiography derived functional assessment of non-culprit coronary stenoses in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention. 2020 Apr 3;15(18):e1594-e1601. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01165.

Safi H, Bourantas CV, Ramasamy A, Zanchin T, Bär S, Tufaro V, Jin C, Torii R, Karagiannis A, Reiber JHC, Mathur A, Onuma Y, Windecker S, Lansky A, Maehara A, Serruys PW, Stone P, Baumbach A, Stone GW, Räber L. Predictive value of the QFR in detecting vulnerable plaques in non‑fow limiting lesions: a combined analysis of the PROSPECT and IBIS‑4 study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Mar 9. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01805-9. 

Saito Y, Cristea E, Bouras G, Abizaid A, Lutz M, Carrié D, Weber-Albers J, Dudek D, Anderson J, Lansky A. Long-term serial functional evaluation after implantation of the Fantom sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 20. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28804.

Engel LC, Landmesser U, Abdelwahed YS, Jaguszewski M, Gigengack K, Wurster TH, Skurk C, Manes C, Schuster A, Noutsias M, Hamm B, Botnar RM, Makowski MR, Bigalke B. Comprehensive multimodality characterization of hemodynamically significant and non-significant coronary lesions using invasive and noninvasive measures. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 31;15(1):e0228292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228292.

Ozaki Y, Gonzalo N, Salazar CH, Kuku KO, Mejía-Rentería H, Hideo-Kajita A, Núñez-Gil IJ, Escaned J, Waksman R, Garcia-Garcia HM. Comparison of quantitative flow ratio value of left anterior descending and circumflex coronary artery in patients with Takotsubo syndrome. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jan;36(1):3-8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01703-9.

Kanno Y, Sugiyama T, Hoshino M, Usui E, Hamaya R, Kanaji Y, Murai T, Lee T, Yonetsu T, Kakuta T. Optical coherence tomography-defined plaque vulnerability in relation to functional stenosis severity stratified by fractional flow reserve and quantitative flow ratio. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep 1;96(3):E238-E247. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28756. Epub 2020 Feb 3. PMID: 32012438.

Kanno Y, Hoshino M, Hamaya R, Sugiyama T, Kanaji Y, Usui E, Yamaguchi M, Hada M, Ohya H, Sumino Y, Hirano H, Yuki H, Horie T, Murai T, Lee T, Yonetsu T, Kakuta T. Functional classification discordance in intermediate coronary stenoses between fractional flow reserve and angiography-based quantitative flow ratio. Open Heart. 2020 Jan 23;7(1):e001179. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001179. PMID: 32076563; PMCID: PMC6999689.

Cai XQ, Jing J, Wen J, Yin WJ, Liu Y, Hu W, Wang F, Ma L, Zhou SS, Zhang T, Tian F, Chen L, Chen YD.  Quantitative flow ratio and intravascular ultrasound guided percutaneous coronary intervention of left anterior descending lesion concomitant with severe coronary myocardial bridge. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019 Dec;16(12):905-908. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2019.12.004.

Buono A, Mühlenhaus A, Schäfer T, Trieb AK, Schmeißer J, Koppe F, Münzel T, Anadol R, Gori T. QFR Predicts the Incidence of Long-Term Adverse Events in Patients with Suspected CAD: Feasibility and Reproducibility of the Method. J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 14;9(1). pii: E220. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010220.

Sheng X, Qiao Z, Ge H, Sun J, He J, Li Z, Ding S, Pu J. Novel application of quantitative flow ratio for predicting microvascular dysfunction after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jan 8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28718.

Suzuki N, Nishide S, Kimura T, Aoyagi T, Kanamori K, Shiratori Y, Hayami N, Murakawa Y, Kozuma K. Relationship of quantitative flow ratio after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation to clinical outcomes. Heart and Vessels, 2019: 1-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00380-019-01545-4

Qi Q, Liu G, Yuan Z, Liu L, Tu S, Zhao Q. Quantitative flow ratio-guided surgical intervention in symptomatic myocardial bridging. Cardiology Journal, 2019. DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0113

Tang J, Lai Y, Tu S, Chen F, Yao Y, Ye Z, Gu J, Gao Y, Guan C, Chu J, Yang C, Liu X. Quantitative Flow Ratio guided Residual Functional SYNTAX Score for Risk Assessment in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. EuroIntervention. 2019. pii: EIJ-D-19-00369. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00369.

Zaleska M, Koltowski L, Maksym J, Chabior AK, Pohadajło A, Soliński M, Tomaniak M, Opolski G, Kochman J. Quantitative flow ratio and fractional flow reserve mismatch - clinical and biochemical predictors of measurement discrepancy. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2019;15(3):301-307. doi: 10.5114/aic.2019.87883.

Biscaglia S, Tebaldi M, Brugaletta S, Cerrato E, Erriquez A, Passarini G, Ielasi A, Spitaleri G, Di Girolamo D, Mezzapelle G, Geraci S, Manfrini M, Pavasini R, Barbato E, Campo G. Prognostic Value of QFR Measured Immediately After Successful Stent Implantation: The International Multicenter Prospective HAWKEYE Study. JACC Cardiol Intv 2019 Sep 21. pii: S1936-8798(19)31302-0. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.003.

Editorial Comment: Serruys PW, Kogame N, Onuma Y. Was the Ball Inside or Outside the Court? Ask the Hawk-Eye System. JACC: Cardiovascular Intervention. 2019 Sep 20. pii: S1936-8798(19)31455-4.

Kogame N, Takahashi K, Tomaniak M, Chichareon P, Modolo R, Chang CC, Komiyama H, Katagiri Y, Asano T, Stables R, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Walsh S, Sabaté M, Davies J, Piek JJ, van Geuns RJ, Reiber JHC, Banning AP, Escaned J, Farooq V, Serruys PW, Onuma Y. Clinical Implication of Quantitative Flow Ratio After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for 3-Vessel Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 20. pii: S1936-8798(19)31724-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.009.

Editorial Comment: Hakeem A, Uretsky BF. Toward a "More Perfect" Interventional Algorithm: Post-Intervention Functional Assessment Using Quantitative Flow Ratio. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 20. pii: S1936-8798(19)31847-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.032.

Kazuhiro Dan, Akira Shinoda, Daichi Tsuzura, Hector M. Garcia-Garcia. Triple coronary vessel disease including double vessel chronic total occlusion: Quantitative flow ratio minimizes injury of the single vessel that provides collaterals. 

Hamaya R, Horie T, Yonetsu T, Sugano A, Kanaji Y, Usui E, Hoshino M, Yamaguchi M, Ohya H, Sumino Y, Hada M, Hirano H, Kanno Y, Yuki H, Hirao K, Kakuta T. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin decrease after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Heart Vessels. 2019 Jun;34(6):948-956. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-01325-6. Epub 2019 Jan 1. PMID: 30600349.

Liontou C, Mejía-Rentería H, Lauri F, Goto S, Lee HJ, Nakayama M, Quirós A, Macaya F, Gonzalo N, Núñez-Gil I, Salinas P, Del Trigo M, Escaned J. Functional assessment of in-stent restenosis with quantitative flow ratio. EuroIntervention. 2019 Jul 30. pii: EIJ-D-18-00955. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00955.

Sejr-Hansen M, Westra J, Thim T, Christiansen EH, Eftekhari A, Kristensen SD, Jakobsen L, Götberg M, Frøbert O, van der Hoeven NW, Holm NR, Maeng M. Quantitative flow ratio for immediate assessment of nonculprit lesions in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-An iSTEMI substudy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Mar 25. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28208.

Asano T, Katagiri Y, Chang CC, Kogame N, Chichareon P, Takahashi K, Modolo R, Tenekecioglu E, Collet C, Jonker H, Appleby C, Zaman A, van Mieghem N, Uren N, Zueco J, Piek JJ, Reiber JHC, Farooq V, Escaned J, Banning AP, Serruys PW, Onuma Y. Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in the SYNTAX II Trial: Feasibility, Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio, and Clinical Prognostic Value of Functional SYNTAX Score Derived From Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With 3-Vessel Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 11;12(3):259-270. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.023.

Hamaya R, Hoshino M, Kanno Y, Yamaguchi M, Ohya H, Sumino Y, Kanaji Y, Usui E, Murai T, Lee T, Yonetsu T, Hirao K, Kakuta T. Prognostic Implication of Three-Vessel Contrast-Flow Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease. EuroIntervention. 2019 Jan 29. pii: EIJ-D-18-00896. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00896.

Spitaleri G, Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, Westra J, Brugaletta S, Erriquez A, Passarini G, Brieda A, Leone AM, Picchi A, Ielasi A, Girolamo DD, Trani C, Ferrari R, Reiber JHC, Valgimigli M, Sabatè M1, Campo G. Quantitative Flow Ratio Identifies Nonculprit Coronary Lesions Requiring Revascularization in Patients With ST Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb;11(2):e006023. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006023.

Asano T, Katagiri Y, Collet C, Tenekecioglu E, Miyazaki Y, Sotomi Y, Amoroso G, Aminian A, Brugaletta S, Vrolix M, Hernandez-Antolín R, van de Harst P, Iñiguez A, Janssens L, Smits P, Wykrzykowska JJ, Ribeiro VG, Periera H, da Silva PC, Piek JJ, Reiber JHC, von Birgelen C, Sabaté M, Onuma Y, Serruys PW. Functional comparison between BuMA Supreme biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting and durable polymer zotarolimus-eluting coronary stents using Quantitative Flow Ratio: PIONEER QFR substudy. EuroIntervention. 2017 Oct 10. pii: EIJ-D-17-00461. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00461.

Echavarría-Pinto M, Van de Hoef TP, Pacheco-Beltran N, Reyes-Carrera JE, Rangel-Alvarado E, Ledezma-Ledezma E, Aguilar-Castillo LA, Tovar-Becerra AI, Arellano JEM, Ramírez MNM, Muruaga M, Ibarra-Rangel AM, Montes-Collantes CA, Castrejon-Mora JL, Chong-Benitez IH, Vargas-Torrrescano LH, García-García HM. Diagnostic agreement of quantitative flow ratio with fractional flow reserve in a Latin-American population. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Feb 5. doi: 10.1007/s10554-022-02547-6. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35122581.

Cuenin L, Honton B, Aminfar F, Meyer P, Mariottini C, Haessler M, Vareille P, Wijns W, Maillard L, Adjedj J. Head to head comparison of quantitative flow ratio using 4-French and 6-French catheters versus fractional flow reserve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):746-753. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29933. Epub 2021 Sep 1. PMID: 34468076.

Zhu Y, Zhu J, Chen A, Wang Z, Liu J, Zhou M, Ye X, Zhang W, Tu S, Zhao Q.TWO-YEAR OUTCOMES OF QUANTITATIVE FLOW RATIO-GUIDED CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION FOR PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE UNDERGOING PRIMARY VALVE SURGERY (QVAS-PILOT STUDY). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 May, 77 (18_Supplement_1) 78.

Dettori R, Frick M, Burgmaier K, Lubberich K ,Hellmich M, Marx N, Reith S, Burgmaier M, Milzi A. Quantitative Flow Ratio Is Associated with Extent and Severity of Ischemia in Non-Culprit Lesions of Patients with Myocardial Infarction. Journal of clinical Medical. 2021, 10(19), 4535; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194535

Bär S, Kavaliauskaite R, Ueki Y, Otsuka T, Kelbæk H, Engstrøm T, Baumbach A, Roffi M, von Birgelen C, Ostojic M, Pedrazzini G, Kornowski R, Tüller D, Vukcevic V, Magro M, Losdat S, Windecker S, Räber L. Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Nontarget Vessel-Related Events at 5 Years in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Angiography-Guided Revascularization. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 4;10(9):e019052. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019052. Epub 2021 Apr 26. PMID: 33899509; PMCID: PMC8200733.

Finizio M, Melaku GD, Kahsay Y, Beyene S, Kuku KO, Ben-Dor I, Hashim H, Waksman R, Garcia-Garcia HM. Comparison of quantitative flow ratio and invasive physiology indices in a diverse population at a tertiary United States hospital. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Jun 25:S1553-8389(21)00448-6. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.06.115. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34215559.

Erbay A, Penzel L, Abdelwahed YS, Klotsche J, Schatz AS, Steiner J, Haghikia A, Landmesser U, Stähli BE, Leistner DM. Feasibility and diagnostic reliability of quantitative flow ratio in the assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jun;37(6):1815-1823. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02195-2. Epub 2021 Mar 2. PMID: 33651231; PMCID: PMC8255265.

Bär S, Kavaliauskaite R, Ueki Y, Otsuka T, Kelbæk H, Engstrøm T, Baumbach A, Roffi M, von Birgelen C, Ostojic M, Pedrazzini G, Kornowski R, Tüller D, Vukcevic V, Magro M, Losdat S, Windecker S, Räber L. Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Nontarget Vessel-Related Events at 5 Years in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Angiography-Guided Revascularization. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 4;10(9):e019052. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019052. Epub 2021 Apr 26. PMID: 33899509; PMCID: PMC8200733.

Zhang J, Yao M, Jia X, Feng H, Fu J, Tang W, Cong H. The efficacy and safety of quantitative flow ratio-guided complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Cardiol J. 2021 Sep 28. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0111. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34581424.

Cai X, Tian F, Jing J, Jin Q, Zhou S, Yin W, Chen Y, Wu Q, Fu Z, Chen Y. Prognostic value of quantitative flow ratio measured immediately after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 1;97 Suppl 2:1048-1054. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29640. Epub 2021 Mar 20. PMID: 33742738.

Tang J, Hou H, Chu J, Chen F, Yao Y, Gao Y, Ye Z, Zhuang S, Lai Y, Liu X. Clinical implication of quantitative flow ratio to predict clinical events after drug-coated balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis. Clin Cardiol. 2021 Jul;44(7):978-986. doi: 10.1002/clc.23630. Epub 2021 May 19. PMID: 34009672; PMCID: PMC8259159.

Geng L, Yuan Y, Du P, Gao L, Wang Y, Li J, Guo W, Huang Y, Zhang Q. Association of quantitative flow ratio-derived microcirculatory indices with anatomical-functional discordance in intermediate coronary lesions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Oct;37(10):2803-2813. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02292-2. Epub 2021 May 31. PMID: 34059977.

Takenaka H, Okamura T, Miyazaki Y, Fujimura T, Ono A, Nakamura T, Tateishi H, Mochizuki M, Akase H, Suetomi T, Uchinoumi H, Oda T, Yano M. Serial changes in the quantitative flow ratio in patients with intermediate residual stenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart Vessels. 2021 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01923-x. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34417846.

van Diemen PA, de Winter RW, Schumacher SP, Bom MJ, Driessen RS, Everaars H, Jukema RA, Somsen YB, Popelkova L, van de Ven PM, van Rossum AC, van de Hoef TP, de Haan S, Marques KM, Lemkes JS, Appelman Y, Nap A, Verouden NJ, Opolski MP, Danad I, Knaapen P. Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio to Estimate Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve. J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Aug 31;2021:4339451. doi: 10.1155/2021/4339451. PMID: 34548847; PMCID: PMC8426071.

Kirigaya H, Okada K, Hibi K, Maejima N, Iwahashi N, Matsuzawa Y, Akiyama E, Minamimoto Y, Kosuge M, Ebina T, Tamura K, Kimura K. Diagnostic performance and limitation of quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of intermediate coronary stenosis. J Cardiol. 2021 May;77(5):492-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 24. PMID: 33246845.

Lee KY, Hwang BH, Kim MJ, Choo EH, Choi IJ, Kim CJ, Lee SW, Lee JM, Kim MJ, Jeon DS, Chung WS, Youn HJ, Kim KJ, Yoon MH, Chang K. Influence of lesion and disease subsets on the diagnostic performance of the quantitative flow ratio in real-world patients. Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):2995. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82235-y. PMID: 33542310; PMCID: PMC7862355.

Milzi A, Dettori R, Burgmaier K, Marx N, Reith S, Burgmaier M. Quantitative Flow Ratio Is Related to Intraluminal Coronary Stenosis Parameters as Assessed with Optical Coherence Tomography. J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 24;10(9):1856. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091856. PMID: 33923243; PMCID: PMC8123110.

Cuenin L, Honton B, Aminfar F, Meyer P, Mariottini C, Haessler M, Vareille P, Wijns W, Maillard L, Adjedj J. Head to head comparison of quantitative flow ratio using 4-French and 6-French catheters versus fractional flow reserve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 1. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29933. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34468076.

Westra J, Sejr-Hansen M, Kołtowski Ł, Mejía-Rentería H, Tu S, Kochman J, Zhang Y, Liu T, Campo G, Hjort J, Mogensen LJH, Erriquez A, Andersen BK, Eftekhari A, Escaned J, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Reproducibility of Quantitative Flow Ratio: The QREP Study. EuroIntervention. 2021 Jul 6:EIJ-D-21-00425. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29933. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34468076.

Kleczynski P, Dziewierz A, Rzeszutko L, Dudek D, Legutko J. Quantitative flow ratio for evaluation of borderline coronary lesions in patients with severe aortic stenosis. El cociente de flujo cuantitativo en pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave y lesiones coronarias intermedias .Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition). Available online 21 May 202 .doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.04.008

Dan K, Garcia-Garcia HM, Yacob O, Kuku KO, Kolm P, Shah N, Bennett MR, Curzen N, Waksman R, Mahmoudi M. Comparison of plaque distribution and wire-free functional assessment in patients with stable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: an optical coherence tomography and quantitative flow ratio study. Coron Artery Dis. 2021 Mar 1;32(2):131-137. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000944. PMID: 32826449.

Milzi A, Dettori R, Burgmaier K, Marx N, Reith S, Burgmaier M. Quantitative Flow Ratio Is Related to Intraluminal Coronary Stenosis Parameters as Assessed with Optical Coherence Tomography. J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 24;10(9):1856. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091856. PMID: 33923243; PMCID: PMC8123110.

Adjedj J, Hyafil F, Aminfar F, Halna du Fretay X, Picard F, Dupouy P, Juliard JM, Muller O, Wijns W, Aubry P; ANOCOR Investigators. Feasibility of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Adult Patients With Anomalous Aortic Origin of the Coronary Artery With 5 Years of Clinical Follow-up. J Invasive Cardiol. 2021 Apr;33(4):E269-E274. Epub 2021 Mar 8. PMID: 33723087.

Lee KY, Hwang BH, Kim MJ, Choo EH, Choi IJ, Kim CJ, Lee SW, Lee JM, Kim MJ, Jeon DS, Chung WS, Youn HJ, Kim KJ, Yoon MH, Chang K. Influence of lesion and disease subsets on the diagnostic performance of the quantitative flow ratio in real-world patients. Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):2995. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82235-y. PMID: 33542310; PMCID: PMC7862355.

Sejr-Hansen M, Christiansen EH, Ahmad Y, Vendrik J, Westra J, Holm NR, Thim T, Seligman H, Hall K, Sen S, Terkelsen CJ, Eftekhari A. Performance of quantitative flow ratio in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 3. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29518. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33533535.

Dai N, Hwang D, Lee JM, Zhang J, Tong Y, Jeon KH, Paeng JC, Cheon GJ, Koo BK, Ge J. Association of Quantitative Flow Ratio with Lesion Severity and Its Ability to Discriminate Myocardial Ischemia. Korean Circ J. 2021 Feb;51(2):126-139. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0375. PMID: 33525067; PMCID: PMC7853889.

Bär S, Kavaliauskaite R, Ueki Y, Otsuka T, Kelbæk H, Engstrøm T, Baumbach A, Roffi M, von Birgelen C, Ostojic M, Pedrazzini G, Kornowski R, Tüller D, Vukcevic V, Magro M, Losdat S, Windecker S, Räber L. Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Nontarget Vessel-Related Events at 5 Years in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Angiography-Guided Revascularization. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 4;10(9):e019052. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019052. Epub 2021 Apr 26. PMID: 33899509.

Tang J, Hou H, Chu J, Chen F, Yao Y, Gao Y, Ye Z, Zhuang S, Lai Y, Liu X. Clinical implication of quantitative flow ratio to predict clinical events after drug-coated balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis. Clin Cardiol. 2021 May 19. doi: 10.1002/clc.23630. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34009672.

Tu S, Ding D, Chang Y, Li C, Wijns W, Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar 4. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29592. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33660921.

Tang J, Chu J, Hou H, Lai Y, Tu S, Chen F, Yao Y, Ye Z, Gao Y, Mao Y, Zhuang S, Liu X. Clinical implication of QFR in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after drug-eluting stent implantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Oct 12. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02068-0. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33044717.

Lenk K, Schwarzbach V, Antoniadis M, Blum M, Zeynalova S, Hagendorff A, Leistner D, Landmesser U, Lavall D, Laufs U. Angiography-based quantitative coronary contrast-flow ratio measurements correlate with myocardial ischemia assessed by stress MRI. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Aug;36(8):1407-1416. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01855-z. Epub 2020 May 4. PMID: 32367188; PMCID: PMC7381441.

Tang J, Chu J, Hou H, Lai Y, Tu S, Chen F, Yao Y, Ye Z, Gao Y, Mao Y, Zhuang S, Liu X. Clinical implication of QFR in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after drug-eluting stent implantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Oct 12. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02068-0. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33044717.

van Diemen PA, Driessen RS, Kooistra RA, Stuijfzand WJ, Raijmakers PG, Boellaard R, Schumacher SP, Bom MJ, Everaars H, de Winter RW, van de Ven PM, Reiber JH, Min JK, Leipsic JA, Knuuti J, Underwood RS, van Rossum AC, Danad I, Knaapen P. Comparison Between the Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Perfusion Imaging for Diagnosing Myocardial Ischemia. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Sep;13(9):1976-1985. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Apr 15. PMID: 32305469.

Strähl M, Schindler M, Keller LS, Holy E, Jakob P, Siegrist PT, Templin C, Maier W, Buechel RR, Kaufmann PA, Gebhard C, Stähli BE. Diagnostic performance of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio for the identification of myocardial ischemia as assessed by ¹³N-ammonia myocardial perfusion imaging positron emission tomography. Int J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 27. pii: S0167-5273(20)31381-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.069.

Mejía-Rentería H, Nombela-Franco L, Paradis JM, Lunardi M, Lee JM, Amat-Santos IJ, Veiga Fernandez G, Kalra A, Bansal EJ, de la Torre Hernandez JM, Rodés-Cabau J, Ribichini FL, Escaned J; Collaborators. Angiography-based quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease and severe aortic stenosis. EuroIntervention. 2020 Jul 17;16(4):e285-e292. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01001. PMID: 32207408.

Rubimbura V, Guillon B, Fournier S, Amabile N, Chi Pan C, Combaret N, Eeckhout E, Kibler M, Silvain J, Wijns W, Schiele F, Muller O, Meneveau N, Adjedj J. Quantitative flow ratio virtual stenting and post stenting correlations to post stenting fractional flow reserve measurements from the DOCTORS (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting) study population. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 25. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28615.

Sejr-Hansen M, Westra J, Winther S, Tu S, Nissen L, Gormsen L, Petersen SE, Ejlersen J, Isaksen C, Bøtker HE, Bøttcher M, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Comparison of quantitative flow ratio and fractional flow reserve with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and cardiovascular magnetic resonance as reference standard. A Dan-NICAD substudy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Nov 19. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01737-z.

Erbay A, Steiner J, Lauten A, Landmesser U, Leistner DM, Stähli BE. Assessment of intermediate coronary lesions by fractional flow reserve and quantitative flow ratio in patients with small-vessel disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 21. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28531.

Tanigaki T, Emori H, Kawase Y, Kubo T, Omori H, Shiono Y, Sobue Y, Shimamura K, Hirata T, Matsuo Y, Ota H, Kitabata H, Okubo M, Ino Y, Matsuo H and Akasaka T. QFR Versus FFR Derived From Computed Tomography for Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis JACC: Cardiovascular Intervention.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 28;12(20):2050-2059. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.043. PMID: 31648766.

Ding D, Yang J, Westra J, Chen Y, Chang Y, Sejr-Hansen M, Zhang S, Christiansen EH, Holm NR, Tu S. Accuracy of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for predicting physiological significance of coronary stenosis: a FAVOR II substudy. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019 Oct;9(5):481-491. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2019.09.07. PMID: 31737519; PMCID: PMC6837915.

Lauri F, Macaya F, Mejía-Rentería H, Goto S, Yeoh J, Nakayama M, Quirós A, Liontou C, Pareek N, Fernández-Ortíz A, Macaya C, MacCarthy P, Escaned J. Angiography-derived functional assessment of non-culprit coronary stenoses during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. EuroIntervention. 2019 Sep 24. pii: EIJ-D-18-01165. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01165.

Mejía-Rentería H, Lauri FM, Lee JM, McInerney A, van der Hoeven NW, de Waard GA, Fernández-Ortiz A, Macaya C, Knaapen P, van Royen N, Koo BK, Escaned J. Interindividual Variations in the Adenosine-Induced Hemodynamics During Fractional Flow Reserve Evaluation: Implications for the Use of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Assessing Intermediate Coronary Stenoses. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Aug 20;8(16):e012906. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012906. Epub 2019 Aug 9. PMID: 31394987; PMCID: PMC6759899.

Masahiro Watarai, Masato Otsuka, Kyoichiro Yazaki, Yusuke Inagaki, Mitsuru Kahata, Asako Kumagai, Koji Inoue, Hiroshi Koganei, Kenji Enta, Yasuhiro Ishii. Applicability of quantitative flow ratio for rapid evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis: comparison with instantaneous wave‑free ratio in clinical practice. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01656-z.

Carlos Cortés Tania Rodríguez-Gabell, Hipólito Gutiérrez, Roman Arnold, Ana María Serrador, Benigno Ramos, Pablo Catalá, Álvaro Aparisi, Williams Hinojosa, Itziar Gómez, Manuel Carrasco Moraleja, Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico, José A. San Román, and Ignacio J. Amat-Santos. Quantitative flow ratio in myocardial infarction for the evaluation of non-infarct-related arteries. The QIMERA pilot study. REC Interv Cardiol. 2019;1(1):13-20

Smit JM, El Mahdiui M, van Rosendael AR, Jukema JW, Koning G, Reiber JHC, Bax JJ, Scholte AJ. Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2019 May 15;123(10):1722-1728. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.035.

Hwang D, Choi KH, Lee JM, Mejía-Rentería H, Kim J, Park J, Rhee TM, Jeon KH, Lee HJ, Kim HK, Park TK, Yang JH, Song YB, Shin ES, Nam CW, Kwak JJ, Doh JH, Hahn JY, Choi JH, Choi SH, Escaned J, Koo BK, Gwon HC. Diagnostic Agreement of Quantitative Flow Ratio With Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Apr 16;8(8):e011605. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011605.

Smit JM, Koning G, van Rosendael AR, El Mahdiui M, Mertens BJ, Schalij MJ, Jukema JW, Delgado V, Reiber JHC, Bax JJ, Scholte AJ. Referral of patients for fractional flow reserve using quantitative flow ratio. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Dec 11. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey187.

Emori H, Kubo T, Kameyama T, Ino Y, Matsuo Y, Kitabata H, Terada K, Katayama Y, Aoki H, Taruya A, Shimamura K, Ota S, Tanaka A, Hozumi T, Akasaka T. Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio for Assessing Myocardial Ischemia in Prior Myocardial Infarction. Circ J. 2018 Jan 16. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0949.

Zhang Y, Zhang S, Westra J, Ding D, Zhao Q, Yang J, Sun Z, Huang J, Pu J, Tu S. Automatic coronary blood flow computation: validation in quantitative flow ratio from coronary angiography. Int J Cardiol. 2018. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1506-y. [Epub ahead of print]

Daan Ties, Randy van Dijk, Gabija Pundziute, Erik Lipsic, Ton E. Vonck, Ad F.M. van den Heuvel, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Matthijs Oudkerk, Pimvan der Harst. Computational quantitative flow ratio to assess functional severity of coronary artery stenosis. Int J Cardiol. 2018 217:36-41. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.002.

Barbara E. Stähli, Aslihan Erbay, Julia Steiner, Jens Klotsche, Hans-Christian Mochmann, Carsten Skurk, Alexander Lauten. Comparison of resting distal to aortic coronary pressure with angiography-based quantitative flow ratio. Int J Cardiol. 2018, epub. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.11.093

Chang Y, Chen L, Westra J, Sun Z, Guan C, Zhang Y, Ding D, Tu S. Reproducibility of quantitative flow ratio: An inter-core laboratory variability study. Cardiol J. 2018 Sep 20. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0105.

Emori H, Kubo T, Kameyama T, Ino Y, Matsuo Y, Kitabata H, Terada K, Katayama Y, Taruya A, Shimamura K, Shiono Y, Tanaka A, Hozumi T and Akasaka T. Quantitative flow ratio and instantaneous wave-free ratio for the assessment of the functional severity of intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Coronary Artery Disease 2018, Vol 00 No 00. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000650.

Kołtowski L, Zaleska M, Maksym J, Tomaniak M, Soliński M, Puchta DNiels R, et al. Quantitative flow ratio derived from diagnostic coronary angiography in assessment of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis: a wirefree fractional flow reserve study. Clinical Research in Cardiology .(2018) 107:858–867

Mejía-Rentería H, Lee JM, Lauri F, van der Hoeven NW, de Waard GA, Macaya F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Gonzalo N, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Nombela-Franco L, Salinas P, Núñez-Gil I, Del Trigo M, Goto S, Lee HJ, Liontou C, Fernández-Ortiz A, Macaya C, van Royen N, Koo BK, Escaned J. Influence of Microcirculatory Dysfunction on Angiography-Based Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenoses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 23;11(8):741-753. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.

van Rosendael AR, Koning G, Dimitriu-Leen AC, Smit JM, Montero-Cabezas JM, van der Kley F, Jukema JW, Reiber JHC, Bax JJ and Scholte A. Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2017;33:1305-1312.

Yazaki K, Otsuka M, Kataoka S, Kahata M, Kumagai A, Inoue K, Koganei H, Enta K, Ishii Y. Applicability of 3-Dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography-Derived Computed FractionalFlow Reserve for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis. Circ J. 2017 Jun 23;81(7):988-992. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1261.

Smit JM, Koning G, van Rosendael AR, Dibbets-Schneider P, Mertens BJ, Jukema JW, Delgado V, Reiber JHC, Bax JJ, Scholte AJ. Relationship Between Coronary Contrast-Flow Quantitative Flow Ratio and Myocardial IschemiaAssessed by SPECT MPI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jul 6. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3769-2.

Liu L, Yang W, Nagahara Y, Li Y, Lamooki SR, Muramatsu T, Kitslaar P, Sarai M, Ozaki Y, Barlis P, Yan F, Reiber JHC, Tu S. The impact of image resolution on computation of fractional flow reserve: coronary computed tomography angiography versus 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 32: 513-523.

Secchi F, Ali M, Faggiano E, Cannao PM, Fedele M, Tresoldi S, Leo G Di, Auricchio F, Sardanelli F. Fractional flow reserve based on computed tomography: an overview Eur Heart J Suppl 2016; 18(Supp E): E49-E56

Tu S, Echavarria-Pinto M, von Birgelen C, Holm NR, Pyxaras SA, Kumsars I, Lam MK, Valkenburg I, Toth GG, Li Y,Escaned J, Wijns W, Reiber JH. Fractional flow reserve and coronary bifurcation anatomy: a novel quantitative model to assess and report the stenosis severity of bifurcation lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):564-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.232.

Tu S, Barbato E, Köszegi Z, Yang J, Sun Z, Holm NR, Tar B, Li Y, Rusinaru D, Wijns W, Reiber JH. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jul;7(7):768-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.03.004.

Editorial Comment: Giddens DP (Editorial Comment) Computing Fractional Flow Reserve during coronary angiography. How good is good enough? J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2016; 9(19): 2036-38

Tu S, Xu L, Ligthart J, Witberg K, Sun Z, Koning G, Reiber JH, Regar E. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Aug;28(6):1315-27. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0016-6.

Tu S, Holm NR, Koning G, Maeng M, Reiber JH. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug 1;78(2):214-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23047.

Tu S, Hao P, Koning G, Wei X, Song X, Chen A, Reiber JH. In vivo assessment of optimal viewing angles from X-ray coronary angiography. Euro Intervention. 2011 May;7(1):112-20. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I1A19.

Tu S, Huang Z, Koning G, Cui K, Reiber JH. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug 1;76(2):291-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22502.

Tu S, Koning G, Jukema W, Reiber JH. Assessment of obstruction length and optimal viewing angle from biplane X-ray angiograms. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jan;26(1):5-17. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9509-3.

Huihong Hong, Haibo Jia, Ming Zeng, Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico, Yini Wang, Xiaoling Zeng, Yuhan Qin, Chen Zhao, Miao Chu, Jiayue Huang, Lili Liu, Sining Hu, Luping He, Lianglong Chen, William Wijns, Bo Yu, Shengxian Tu S.Risk Stratification in Acute Coronary Syndrome by Comprehensive Morphofunctional Assessment With Optical Coherence Tomography JACC: Asia.2022
ISSN 2772-3747,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.03.004.

Zeng X, Holck EN, Westra J, Hu F, Huang J, Emori H, Kubo T, Wijns W, Chen L, Tu S. Impact of coronary plaque morphology on the precision of computational fractional flow reserve derived from optical coherence tomography imaging. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2022 Apr;12(2):155-165. doi: 10.21037/cdt-21-505. PMID: 35433350; PMCID: PMC9011092.

Ding D, Yu W, Tauzin H, De Maria GL, Wu P, Yang F, Kotronias RA, Terentes-Printzios D, Wolfrum M, Banning AP, Meneveau N, Wijns W, Tu S. Optical Flow Ratio for Assessing Stenting Result and Physiological Significance of Residual Disease. EuroIntervention. 2021 Jun 8:EIJ-D-21-00185. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00185. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34105514.

Wu P, Gutiérrez-Chico JL, Tauzin H, Yang W, Li Y, Yu W, Chu M, Guillon B, Bai J, Meneveau N, Wijns W, Tu S. Automatic stent reconstruction in optical coherence tomography based on a deep convolutional model. Biomed Opt Express. 2020 May 29;11(6):3374-3394. doi: 10.1364/BOE.390113. PMID: 32637261; PMCID: PMC7316028.

Chu M, Jia H, Gutiérrez-Chico JL, Maehara A, Ali ZA, Zeng X, He L, Zhao C, Matsumura M, Wu P, Zeng M, Kubo T, Chen L, Yu B, Mintz GS, Wijns W, Holm NR, Tu S. Automatic Characterisation of Human Atherosclerotic Plaque Composition from Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Using Artificial Intelligence. EuroIntervention. 2021 Feb 2:EIJ-D-20-01355. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01355. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33528359.

Emori H, Kubo T, Shiono Y, Ino Y, Shimamura K, Terada K, Nishi T, Higashioka D, Takahata M, Wada T, Kashiwagi M, Khalifa AKM, Tanaka A, Hozumi T, Tu S, Akasaka T. Comparison of Optical Flow Ratio and Fractional Flow Ratio in Stent-Treated Arteries Immediately After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circ J. 2020 Oct 29. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0661. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33115983.

Gutiérrez-Chico JL , Chen Y, Yu W , Ding D, Huang J, Huang P, Jing J, Chu M, Wu P, Tian F, Tu S. Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of optical flow ratio for functional evaluation of coronary stenosis in a prospective series. Cardiol J. 2020;27(4):350-361. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0071. Epub 2020 May 21.

Huang J, Emori H, Ding D, Kubo T, Yu W, Huang P, Zhang S, Gutiérrez-Chico JL, Akasaka T, Wijns W, Tu S. Diagnostic performance of intracoronary optical coherence tomography-based versus angiography-based fractional flow reserve for the evaluation of coronary lesions. EuroIntervention. 2020 Sep 18;16(7):568-576. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01034. PMID: 31951207.

Yu W, Huang H, Jia D, Chen S, Raffel OC, Ding D, Tian F, Kan J, Zhang S, Yan Y, Chen Y, Bezerra HG, Wijns W, Tu S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Severity. EuroIntervention. 2019 Jun 20;15(2):189-197. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00182.

Tian F, Yu W, Huang J, Zhang T, Chen Y, Tu S. First Presentation of Integration of Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography and Computational Fractional Flow Reserve. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019 Apr;35(4):601-602. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1491-1. Epub 2018 Nov 2. PMID: 30390169.

Sui Y, Yang M, Xu Y, Wu N, Qian J. Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve versus angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for evaluating left main coronary artery stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb 7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30078. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35129284.

Yu W, Tanigaki T, Ding D, Wu P, Du H, Ling L, Huang B, Li G, Yang W, Zhang S, Yan F, Okubo M, Matsuo H, Wijns W, Tu S.Accuracy of Intravascular Ultrasound-Based Fractional Flow Reserve in Identifying Hemodynamic Significance of Coronary Stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb;14(2):e009840. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009840. Epub 2021 Feb 5. PMID: 33541105.