Zhu Y, Zhu J, Chen A, Wang Z, Liu J, Zhou M, Ye X, Zhang W, Tu S, Zhao Q.TWO-YEAR OUTCOMES OF QUANTITATIVE FLOW RATIO-GUIDED CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION FOR PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE UNDERGOING PRIMARY VALVE SURGERY (QVAS-PILOT STUDY). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 May, 77 (18_Supplement_1) 78.

Dettori R, Frick M, Burgmaier K, Lubberich K ,Hellmich M, Marx N, Reith S, Burgmaier M, Milzi A. Quantitative Flow Ratio Is Associated with Extent and Severity of Ischemia in Non-Culprit Lesions of Patients with Myocardial Infarction. Journal of clinical Medical. 2021, 10(19), 4535; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194535

Bär S, Kavaliauskaite R, Ueki Y, Otsuka T, Kelbæk H, Engstrøm T, Baumbach A, Roffi M, von Birgelen C, Ostojic M, Pedrazzini G, Kornowski R, Tüller D, Vukcevic V, Magro M, Losdat S, Windecker S, Räber L. Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Nontarget Vessel-Related Events at 5 Years in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Angiography-Guided Revascularization. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 4;10(9):e019052. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019052. Epub 2021 Apr 26. PMID: 33899509; PMCID: PMC8200733.

Finizio M, Melaku GD, Kahsay Y, Beyene S, Kuku KO, Ben-Dor I, Hashim H, Waksman R, Garcia-Garcia HM. Comparison of quantitative flow ratio and invasive physiology indices in a diverse population at a tertiary United States hospital. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 Jun 25:S1553-8389(21)00448-6. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.06.115. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34215559.

Erbay A, Penzel L, Abdelwahed YS, Klotsche J, Schatz AS, Steiner J, Haghikia A, Landmesser U, Stähli BE, Leistner DM. Feasibility and diagnostic reliability of quantitative flow ratio in the assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute coronary syndrome. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jun;37(6):1815-1823. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02195-2. Epub 2021 Mar 2. PMID: 33651231; PMCID: PMC8255265.

Bär S, Kavaliauskaite R, Ueki Y, Otsuka T, Kelbæk H, Engstrøm T, Baumbach A, Roffi M, von Birgelen C, Ostojic M, Pedrazzini G, Kornowski R, Tüller D, Vukcevic V, Magro M, Losdat S, Windecker S, Räber L. Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Nontarget Vessel-Related Events at 5 Years in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Angiography-Guided Revascularization. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 4;10(9):e019052. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019052. Epub 2021 Apr 26. PMID: 33899509; PMCID: PMC8200733.

Zhang J, Yao M, Jia X, Feng H, Fu J, Tang W, Cong H. The efficacy and safety of quantitative flow ratio-guided complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Cardiol J. 2021 Sep 28. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0111. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34581424.

Cai X, Tian F, Jing J, Jin Q, Zhou S, Yin W, Chen Y, Wu Q, Fu Z, Chen Y. Prognostic value of quantitative flow ratio measured immediately after drug-coated balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 1;97 Suppl 2:1048-1054. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29640. Epub 2021 Mar 20. PMID: 33742738.

Tang J, Hou H, Chu J, Chen F, Yao Y, Gao Y, Ye Z, Zhuang S, Lai Y, Liu X. Clinical implication of quantitative flow ratio to predict clinical events after drug-coated balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis. Clin Cardiol. 2021 Jul;44(7):978-986. doi: 10.1002/clc.23630. Epub 2021 May 19. PMID: 34009672; PMCID: PMC8259159.

Geng L, Yuan Y, Du P, Gao L, Wang Y, Li J, Guo W, Huang Y, Zhang Q. Association of quantitative flow ratio-derived microcirculatory indices with anatomical-functional discordance in intermediate coronary lesions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Oct;37(10):2803-2813. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02292-2. Epub 2021 May 31. PMID: 34059977.

Takenaka H, Okamura T, Miyazaki Y, Fujimura T, Ono A, Nakamura T, Tateishi H, Mochizuki M, Akase H, Suetomi T, Uchinoumi H, Oda T, Yano M. Serial changes in the quantitative flow ratio in patients with intermediate residual stenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart Vessels. 2021 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01923-x. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34417846.

van Diemen PA, de Winter RW, Schumacher SP, Bom MJ, Driessen RS, Everaars H, Jukema RA, Somsen YB, Popelkova L, van de Ven PM, van Rossum AC, van de Hoef TP, de Haan S, Marques KM, Lemkes JS, Appelman Y, Nap A, Verouden NJ, Opolski MP, Danad I, Knaapen P. Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio to Estimate Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve. J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Aug 31;2021:4339451. doi: 10.1155/2021/4339451. PMID: 34548847; PMCID: PMC8426071.

Kirigaya H, Okada K, Hibi K, Maejima N, Iwahashi N, Matsuzawa Y, Akiyama E, Minamimoto Y, Kosuge M, Ebina T, Tamura K, Kimura K. Diagnostic performance and limitation of quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of intermediate coronary stenosis. J Cardiol. 2021 May;77(5):492-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.11.002. Epub 2020 Nov 24. PMID: 33246845.

Lee KY, Hwang BH, Kim MJ, Choo EH, Choi IJ, Kim CJ, Lee SW, Lee JM, Kim MJ, Jeon DS, Chung WS, Youn HJ, Kim KJ, Yoon MH, Chang K. Influence of lesion and disease subsets on the diagnostic performance of the quantitative flow ratio in real-world patients. Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):2995. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82235-y. PMID: 33542310; PMCID: PMC7862355.

Milzi A, Dettori R, Burgmaier K, Marx N, Reith S, Burgmaier M. Quantitative Flow Ratio Is Related to Intraluminal Coronary Stenosis Parameters as Assessed with Optical Coherence Tomography. J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 24;10(9):1856. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091856. PMID: 33923243; PMCID: PMC8123110.

Cuenin L, Honton B, Aminfar F, Meyer P, Mariottini C, Haessler M, Vareille P, Wijns W, Maillard L, Adjedj J. Head to head comparison of quantitative flow ratio using 4-French and 6-French catheters versus fractional flow reserve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 1. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29933. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34468076.

Westra J, Sejr-Hansen M, Kołtowski Ł, Mejía-Rentería H, Tu S, Kochman J, Zhang Y, Liu T, Campo G, Hjort J, Mogensen LJH, Erriquez A, Andersen BK, Eftekhari A, Escaned J, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Reproducibility of Quantitative Flow Ratio: The QREP Study. EuroIntervention. 2021 Jul 6:EIJ-D-21-00425. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29933. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34468076.

Kleczynski P, Dziewierz A, Rzeszutko L, Dudek D, Legutko J. Quantitative flow ratio for evaluation of borderline coronary lesions in patients with severe aortic stenosis . El cociente de flujo cuantitativo en pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave y lesiones coronarias intermedias .Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition). Available online 21 May 202 .doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2021.04.008

Dan K, Garcia-Garcia HM, Yacob O, Kuku KO, Kolm P, Shah N, Bennett MR, Curzen N, Waksman R, Mahmoudi M. Comparison of plaque distribution and wire-free functional assessment in patients with stable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: an optical coherence tomography and quantitative flow ratio study. Coron Artery Dis. 2021 Mar 1;32(2):131-137. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000944. PMID: 32826449.

Milzi A, Dettori R, Burgmaier K, Marx N, Reith S, Burgmaier M. Quantitative Flow Ratio Is Related to Intraluminal Coronary Stenosis Parameters as Assessed with Optical Coherence Tomography. J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 24;10(9):1856. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091856. PMID: 33923243; PMCID: PMC8123110.

Adjedj J, Hyafil F, Aminfar F, Halna du Fretay X, Picard F, Dupouy P, Juliard JM, Muller O, Wijns W, Aubry P; ANOCOR Investigators. Feasibility of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Adult Patients With Anomalous Aortic Origin of the Coronary Artery With 5 Years of Clinical Follow-up. J Invasive Cardiol. 2021 Apr;33(4):E269-E274. Epub 2021 Mar 8. PMID: 33723087.

Lee KY, Hwang BH, Kim MJ, Choo EH, Choi IJ, Kim CJ, Lee SW, Lee JM, Kim MJ, Jeon DS, Chung WS, Youn HJ, Kim KJ, Yoon MH, Chang K. Influence of lesion and disease subsets on the diagnostic performance of the quantitative flow ratio in real-world patients. Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 4;11(1):2995. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82235-y. PMID: 33542310; PMCID: PMC7862355.

Sejr-Hansen M, Christiansen EH, Ahmad Y, Vendrik J, Westra J, Holm NR, Thim T, Seligman H, Hall K, Sen S, Terkelsen CJ, Eftekhari A. Performance of quantitative flow ratio in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 3. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29518. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33533535.

Dai N, Hwang D, Lee JM, Zhang J, Tong Y, Jeon KH, Paeng JC, Cheon GJ, Koo BK, Ge J. Association of Quantitative Flow Ratio with Lesion Severity and Its Ability to Discriminate Myocardial Ischemia. Korean Circ J. 2021 Feb;51(2):126-139. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0375. PMID: 33525067; PMCID: PMC7853889.

Bär S, Kavaliauskaite R, Ueki Y, Otsuka T, Kelbæk H, Engstrøm T, Baumbach A, Roffi M, von Birgelen C, Ostojic M, Pedrazzini G, Kornowski R, Tüller D, Vukcevic V, Magro M, Losdat S, Windecker S, Räber L. Quantitative Flow Ratio to Predict Nontarget Vessel-Related Events at 5 Years in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Angiography-Guided Revascularization. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 4;10(9):e019052. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019052. Epub 2021 Apr 26. PMID: 33899509.

Tang J, Hou H, Chu J, Chen F, Yao Y, Gao Y, Ye Z, Zhuang S, Lai Y, Liu X. Clinical implication of quantitative flow ratio to predict clinical events after drug-coated balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis. Clin Cardiol. 2021 May 19. doi: 10.1002/clc.23630. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34009672.

Tu S, Ding D, Chang Y, Li C, Wijns W, Xu B. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio for assessment of coronary stenosis significance from a single angiographic view: A novel method based on bifurcation fractal law. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar 4. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29592. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33660921.

Tang J, Chu J, Hou H, Lai Y, Tu S, Chen F, Yao Y, Ye Z, Gao Y, Mao Y, Zhuang S, Liu X. Clinical implication of QFR in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after drug-eluting stent implantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Oct 12. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02068-0. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33044717.

Lenk K, Schwarzbach V, Antoniadis M, Blum M, Zeynalova S, Hagendorff A, Leistner D, Landmesser U, Lavall D, Laufs U. Angiography-based quantitative coronary contrast-flow ratio measurements correlate with myocardial ischemia assessed by stress MRI. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Aug;36(8):1407-1416. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01855-z. Epub 2020 May 4. PMID: 32367188; PMCID: PMC7381441.

Tang J, Chu J, Hou H, Lai Y, Tu S, Chen F, Yao Y, Ye Z, Gao Y, Mao Y, Zhuang S, Liu X. Clinical implication of QFR in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after drug-eluting stent implantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Oct 12. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-02068-0. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33044717.

van Diemen PA, Driessen RS, Kooistra RA, Stuijfzand WJ, Raijmakers PG, Boellaard R, Schumacher SP, Bom MJ, Everaars H, de Winter RW, van de Ven PM, Reiber JH, Min JK, Leipsic JA, Knuuti J, Underwood RS, van Rossum AC, Danad I, Knaapen P. Comparison Between the Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Perfusion Imaging for Diagnosing Myocardial Ischemia. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Sep;13(9):1976-1985. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Apr 15. PMID: 32305469.

Strähl M, Schindler M, Keller LS, Holy E, Jakob P, Siegrist PT, Templin C, Maier W, Buechel RR, Kaufmann PA, Gebhard C, Stähli BE. Diagnostic performance of angiography-based quantitative flow ratio for the identification of myocardial ischemia as assessed by ¹³N-ammonia myocardial perfusion imaging positron emission tomography. Int J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 27. pii: S0167-5273(20)31381-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.04.069.

Mejía-Rentería H, Nombela-Franco L, Paradis JM, Lunardi M, Lee JM, Amat-Santos IJ, Veiga Fernandez G, Kalra A, Bansal EJ, de la Torre Hernandez JM, Rodés-Cabau J, Ribichini FL, Escaned J; Collaborators. Angiography-based quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease and severe aortic stenosis. EuroIntervention. 2020 Jul 17;16(4):e285-e292. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-01001. PMID: 32207408.

Rubimbura V, Guillon B, Fournier S, Amabile N, Chi Pan C, Combaret N, Eeckhout E, Kibler M, Silvain J, Wijns W, Schiele F, Muller O, Meneveau N, Adjedj J. Quantitative flow ratio virtual stenting and post stenting correlations to post stenting fractional flow reserve measurements from the DOCTORS (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting) study population. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 25. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28615.

Sejr-Hansen M, Westra J, Winther S, Tu S, Nissen L, Gormsen L, Petersen SE, Ejlersen J, Isaksen C, Bøtker HE, Bøttcher M, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Comparison of quantitative flow ratio and fractional flow reserve with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and cardiovascular magnetic resonance as reference standard. A Dan-NICAD substudy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Nov 19. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01737-z.

Erbay A, Steiner J, Lauten A, Landmesser U, Leistner DM, Stähli BE. Assessment of intermediate coronary lesions by fractional flow reserve and quantitative flow ratio in patients with small-vessel disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 21. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28531.

Tanigaki T, Emori H, Kawase Y, Kubo T, Omori H, Shiono Y, Sobue Y, Shimamura K, Hirata T, Matsuo Y, Ota H, Kitabata H, Okubo M, Ino Y, Matsuo H and Akasaka T. QFR Versus FFR Derived From Computed Tomography for Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis JACC: Cardiovascular Intervention.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct 28;12(20):2050-2059. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.043. PMID: 31648766.

Ding D, Yang J, Westra J, Chen Y, Chang Y, Sejr-Hansen M, Zhang S, Christiansen EH, Holm NR, Xu B, Tu S. Accuracy of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for predicting physiological significance of coronary stenosis: a FAVOR II substudy. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019 Oct;9(5):481-491. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2019.09.07. PMID: 31737519; PMCID: PMC6837915.

Lauri F, Macaya F, Mejía-Rentería H, Goto S, Yeoh J, Nakayama M, Quirós A, Liontou C, Pareek N, Fernández-Ortíz A, Macaya C, MacCarthy P, Escaned J. Angiography-derived functional assessment of non-culprit coronary stenoses during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. EuroIntervention. 2019 Sep 24. pii: EIJ-D-18-01165. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01165.

Mejía-Rentería H, Lauri FM, Lee JM, McInerney A, van der Hoeven NW, de Waard GA, Fernández-Ortiz A, Macaya C, Knaapen P, van Royen N, Koo BK, Escaned J. Interindividual Variations in the Adenosine-Induced Hemodynamics During Fractional Flow Reserve Evaluation: Implications for the Use of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Assessing Intermediate Coronary Stenoses. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Aug 20;8(16):e012906. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012906. Epub 2019 Aug 9. PMID: 31394987; PMCID: PMC6759899.

Masahiro Watarai, Masato Otsuka, Kyoichiro Yazaki, Yusuke Inagaki, Mitsuru Kahata, Asako Kumagai, Koji Inoue, Hiroshi Koganei, Kenji Enta, Yasuhiro Ishii. Applicability of quantitative flow ratio for rapid evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis: comparison with instantaneous wave‑free ratio in clinical practice. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01656-z.

Carlos Cortés Tania Rodríguez-Gabell, Hipólito Gutiérrez, Roman Arnold, Ana María Serrador, Benigno Ramos, Pablo Catalá, Álvaro Aparisi, Williams Hinojosa, Itziar Gómez, Manuel Carrasco Moraleja, Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico, José A. San Román, and Ignacio J. Amat-Santos. Quantitative flow ratio in myocardial infarction for the evaluation of non-infarct-related arteries. The QIMERA pilot study. REC Interv Cardiol. 2019;1(1):13-20

Smit JM, El Mahdiui M, van Rosendael AR, Jukema JW, Koning G, Reiber JHC, Bax JJ, Scholte AJ. Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus. Am J Cardiol. 2019 May 15;123(10):1722-1728. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.02.035.

Hwang D, Choi KH, Lee JM, Mejía-Rentería H, Kim J, Park J, Rhee TM, Jeon KH, Lee HJ, Kim HK, Park TK, Yang JH, Song YB, Shin ES, Nam CW, Kwak JJ, Doh JH, Hahn JY, Choi JH, Choi SH, Escaned J, Koo BK, Gwon HC. Diagnostic Agreement of Quantitative Flow Ratio With Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Apr 16;8(8):e011605. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011605.

Smit JM, Koning G, van Rosendael AR, El Mahdiui M, Mertens BJ, Schalij MJ, Jukema JW, Delgado V, Reiber JHC, Bax JJ, Scholte AJ. Referral of patients for fractional flow reserve using quantitative flow ratio. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Dec 11. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jey187.

Emori H, Kubo T, Kameyama T, Ino Y, Matsuo Y, Kitabata H, Terada K, Katayama Y, Aoki H, Taruya A, Shimamura K, Ota S, Tanaka A, Hozumi T, Akasaka T. Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio for Assessing Myocardial Ischemia in Prior Myocardial Infarction. Circ J. 2018 Jan 16. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0949.

Zhang Y, Zhang S, Westra J, Ding D, Zhao Q, Yang J, Sun Z, Huang J, Pu J, Xu B, Tu S. Automatic coronary blood flow computation: validation in quantitative flow ratio from coronary angiography. Int J Cardiol. 2018. doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1506-y. [Epub ahead of print]

Daan Ties, Randy van Dijk, Gabija Pundziute, Erik Lipsic, Ton E. Vonck, Ad F.M. van den Heuvel, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Matthijs Oudkerk, Pimvan der Harst. Computational quantitative flow ratio to assess functional severity of coronary artery stenosis. Int J Cardiol. 2018 217:36-41. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.002.

Barbara E. Stähli, Aslihan Erbay, Julia Steiner, Jens Klotsche, Hans-Christian Mochmann, Carsten Skurk, Alexander Lauten. Comparison of resting distal to aortic coronary pressure with angiography-based quantitative flow ratio. Int J Cardiol. 2018, epub. doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.11.093

Chang Y, Chen L, Westra J, Sun Z, Guan C, Zhang Y, Ding D, Xu B, Tu S. Reproducibility of quantitative flow ratio: An inter-core laboratory variability study. Cardiol J. 2018 Sep 20. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0105.

Emori H, Kubo T, Kameyama T, Ino Y, Matsuo Y, Kitabata H, Terada K, Katayama Y, Taruya A, Shimamura K, Shiono Y, Tanaka A, Hozumi T and Akasaka T. Quantitative flow ratio and instantaneous wave-free ratio for the assessment of the functional severity of intermediate coronary artery stenosis. Coronary Artery Disease 2018, Vol 00 No 00. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000650.

Kołtowski L, Zaleska M, Maksym J, Tomaniak M, Soliński M, Puchta DNiels R, et al. Quantitative flow ratio derived from diagnostic coronary angiography in assessment of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis: a wirefree fractional flow reserve study. Clinical Research in Cardiology .(2018) 107:858–867

Mejía-Rentería H, Lee JM, Lauri F, van der Hoeven NW, de Waard GA, Macaya F, Pérez-Vizcayno MJ, Gonzalo N, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Nombela-Franco L, Salinas P, Núñez-Gil I, Del Trigo M, Goto S, Lee HJ, Liontou C, Fernández-Ortiz A, Macaya C, van Royen N, Koo BK, Escaned J. Influence of Microcirculatory Dysfunction on Angiography-Based Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenoses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 23;11(8):741-753. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.

van Rosendael AR, Koning G, Dimitriu-Leen AC, Smit JM, Montero-Cabezas JM, van der Kley F, Jukema JW, Reiber JHC, Bax JJ and Scholte A. Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2017;33:1305-1312.

Yazaki K, Otsuka M, Kataoka S, Kahata M, Kumagai A, Inoue K, Koganei H, Enta K, Ishii Y. Applicability of 3-Dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography-Derived Computed FractionalFlow Reserve for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis. Circ J. 2017 Jun 23;81(7):988-992. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1261.

Smit JM, Koning G, van Rosendael AR, Dibbets-Schneider P, Mertens BJ, Jukema JW, Delgado V, Reiber JHC, Bax JJ, Scholte AJ. Relationship Between Coronary Contrast-Flow Quantitative Flow Ratio and Myocardial IschemiaAssessed by SPECT MPI. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jul 6. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3769-2.

Liu L, Yang W, Nagahara Y, Li Y, Lamooki SR, Muramatsu T, Kitslaar P, Sarai M, Ozaki Y, Barlis P, Yan F, Reiber JHC, Tu S. The impact of image resolution on computation of fractional flow reserve: coronary computed tomography angiography versus 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 32: 513-523.

Secchi F, Ali M, Faggiano E, Cannao PM, Fedele M, Tresoldi S, Leo G Di, Auricchio F, Sardanelli F. Fractional flow reserve based on computed tomography: an overview Eur Heart J Suppl 2016; 18(Supp E): E49-E56

Tu S, Echavarria-Pinto M, von Birgelen C, Holm NR, Pyxaras SA, Kumsars I, Lam MK, Valkenburg I, Toth GG, Li Y,Escaned J, Wijns W, Reiber JH. Fractional flow reserve and coronary bifurcation anatomy: a novel quantitative model to assess and report the stenosis severity of bifurcation lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):564-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.232.

Tu S, Barbato E, Köszegi Z, Yang J, Sun Z, Holm NR, Tar B, Li Y, Rusinaru D, Wijns W, Reiber JH. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jul;7(7):768-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.03.004.

Editorial Comment: Giddens DP (Editorial Comment) Computing Fractional Flow Reserve during coronary angiography. How good is good enough? J Am Coll Cardiol Interv. 2016; 9(19): 2036-38

Tu S, Xu L, Ligthart J, Xu B, Witberg K, Sun Z, Koning G, Reiber JH, Regar E. In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Aug;28(6):1315-27. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0016-6.

Tu S, Holm NR, Koning G, Maeng M, Reiber JH. The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug 1;78(2):214-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23047.

Tu S, Hao P, Koning G, Wei X, Song X, Chen A, Reiber JH. In vivo assessment of optimal viewing angles from X-ray coronary angiography. Euro Intervention. 2011 May;7(1):112-20. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I1A19.

Tu S, Huang Z, Koning G, Cui K, Reiber JH. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug 1;76(2):291-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22502.

Tu S, Koning G, Jukema W, Reiber JH. Assessment of obstruction length and optimal viewing angle from biplane X-ray angiograms. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jan;26(1):5-17. doi: 10.1007/s10554-009-9509-3.

QFR技术再次在国际顶级心血管介入治疗大会手术实况转播中展示